Who can be a partner in a self-employed company?

Les Echos Publishing - 2020 - Réf : 378186

image

In a self-employed company (Sel), more than half of the share capital and voting rights must, in principle, be held by professionals working within the company. This means that people who do not practice their profession within a Salt can hold part of its capital.

Note: however, flexibility is possible. Thus, in a Salt exercising a legal or judicial profession, the majority of the capital and voting rights may be held by persons exercising not the profession constituting the social object of the company, but simply any one of the legal professions. or judicial.

But, according to the judges, this legal rule does not prohibit the statutes of a Salt from making the status of partner dependent on the exercise of the profession in society. In other words, the statutes of a Salt can validly provide that it is necessary to practice within the company to be a partner.

Thus, in a recent case, a lawyer had ceased to practice his profession in a private limited liability company (Selarl) while retaining the shares he held in this company. When he had wished to take legal action against the manager on behalf of the company (we speak of “social action”) because he accused him of having committed management errors, the judges ruled that his action was inadmissible. Indeed, insofar as the articles of association of the company subordinated the quality of partner to the exercise of the profession in the company, this lawyer had lost the quality of partner, even if he had remained holder of his shares. . He could therefore no longer exercise social action, such action being reserved for partners.

Get in touch

Whatever your question our global team will point you in the right direction

Start the conversation

Research tax credit: subcontracting made easy!

Les Echos Publishing - 2020 - Réf : 378917

image

The judges believe that companies can take into account in their research tax credit base subcontracted work that does not constitute, in isolation, research operations eligible for the research tax credit.

Companies that carry out certain research operations can benefit from a tax credit for this, the famous research tax credit (CIR). Remember that the amount of this tax benefit is 30% of eligible expenses, this rate being lowered to 5% for research expenses incurred above 100 M €. Knowing that companies are not required to perform all of the research internally. They can benefit from the CIR even if they subcontract part of the research operations to public or similar research organizations or to private research organizations approved by the Minister in charge of Research, or to scientific experts. or techniques approved under the same conditions. Note: expenditure subcontracted to public bodies can be retained by the ordering company for double their amount: – if there is no arm’s length relationship between the latter and the subcontractor; – and only for the part of the research operations carried out directly by these organizations. As for expenses entrusted to approved private bodies, they are only retained within the limit of three times the total amount of other research expenses giving rise to the right to the tax credit. However, outsourced expenses are capped at € 2 million per year, this ceiling being raised to € 10 million in the absence of a dependency relationship between the ordering company and the subcontracting organization, or even to € 12 million. if the outsourcing takes place with a public research organization or similar. As such, while the tax administration requires that the outsourced expenditure constitute by nature real research operations eligible for the CIR, the Council of State has just softened this position.

It has thus come to the conclusion that the contracting companies can take into account subcontracted services in their CIR base, even if these, taken in isolation, do not constitute research operations. Note: in this case, the subcontracted work consisted of analytical studies and impact tests that the contracting company could not carry out itself because it did not have the necessary equipment and tools. The State Council noted in particular that the subcontracted work fell within the scientific framework of the projects carried out by the contracting company and that they were necessary for the realization of these same projects.


Get in touch

Whatever your question our global team will point you in the right direction

Start the conversation
Get in touch
x
x

Share to:

Copy link:

Copied to clipboard Copy